Hey there. 5 days to go till Book 7! Meanwhile, my meandering musings on the Harry Potter films…
I saw the movie version of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix last Wednesday in Glorietta 4 (it had been a couple of years since I’d caught a flick there). I’ve never been picky about how big or wide (or flat, for that matter) the screen/monitor I’m watching on is, but for the first time I found myself lamenting how the screen seemed to be undersized — disappointingly so. “Creevey TV”, I thought.
In comparison, my boss told me that he and his family (his eldest being the resident Pottermaniac) trekked to the Mall of Asia and watched HP5 at the IMAX theater. Or perhaps the better way to put it is that they “experienced” HP5. The gigantic (”Grawpy”?) screen and 3-D effects in the last 20 minutes reportedly were beyond awesome; his young kids were fully awake though the screening was from 11 p.m. to 1:30 a.m (as all other screenings were sold out).
Oh well, good for them. Tonight I get to watch the fifth film for the second time, courtesy of my buddy’s free passes to Eastwood.
This movie isn’t my favorite of the five to date, though I thought it was a lot better than Goblet of Fire (which I just re-viewed on cable the other day). My barometer for the films is how well they capture (what I consider to be) the essence of the original work, how well they “get it”. For this reason, I think the first film Sorcerer’s Stone succeeds highly as an adaptation. Admittedly, it is the simplest and shortest of the books and thus it was fairly straightforward to translate to screen.
The Prisoner of Azkaban film would have been the best if it weren’t for a major bad call in omitting a theme at the book’s heart: Harry finding his connection to his father. That the filmmakers didn’t feel this was important enough to keep is evinced by 2 of their decisions. First: omitting the significance of Harry’s Patronus being a stag. How many more seconds would it have taken to say that James’s animal form (whence hiis nickname “Prongs”) was a stag? The other: Sirius’s parting words to Harry before the former flies away to freedom was “You truly are your father’s son” in the book, but in the movie this is shifted to Sirius telling Hermione “You truly are the brightest witch of your age.” What the?!?!? To have made these choices for the film, I feel, gutted the emotional heart of the story. (As well, Sirius treating Harry as if he were his best friend James himself is key in the later books.) All the 3rd film has going for it is the time-travel sequence (which for me is the most brilliant of Harry’s escapades in all the books), but this is really owes to the strength of Rowling’s story (pure genius to pull off the climax of a “children’s book” with this device!) rather than the filmmakers’ treatment.
Re HP5. I have concerns whether non-fans (or, more accurately, those who haven’t read the book) will be able to follow the plot. I imagine they’d go, “Who’s this friggin’ Mrs. Figg?” The length of Books 4 and 5 doesn’t lend easily to film adaptation, particularly the action-packed Goblet of Fire. But, whereas I felt the HP4 movie butchered then reassembled the story a la Frankenstein [for instance, it didn’t make sense that Barty Crouch, Sr. was found dead (a departure from the book), and yet they continued with the Final Task like nothing had happened], Order of the Phoenix was able to distill the key bit, which for me is how government/people in power can be absurd and as a result frighteningly capable of great harm. How successfully (or not) each film conveys this is in large part thanks to the actors. Again, HP4’s casting fell short of my expectations (mainly Crouch Sr., Cho and Fleur, maybe Moody and Krum too); in contrast, HP5’s Imelda Staunton as Umbridge and Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix were superb, spot-on choices, plus there were great moments from Alan Rickman’s Snape and Emma Thompson’s Trelawney.
[Hmm. What if they had kept Gilderoy Lockhart’s part in the 5th film? Then we’d have Kenneth Branagh, his ex-wife (Thompson) and the woman he left his wife for (Bonham Carter, but they’re now exes too) all in the same flick!]
I’m looking forward most to seeing Luna Lovegood again. When Jo Rowling dropped by the filming of HP5 and met Evanna Lynch (who plays Luna, after having beat out thousands in an open audition), the author had said Evanna was “perfect” for the part. At the time, I had taken Jo’s compliment to be more generous than accurate. [JKR had also said, years previously, that Emma Watson was the perfect Hermione. Hermione Granger’s my absolute favorite character, but Emma Watson is easily too babe-licious to be Hermione (as a result, her “transformation” at the Yule Ball in the 4th film fell flat). I mean, Cho Chang and Fleur Delacour are supposed to be the irresistable beauties in the books. Even Hermione’s classmates Padma and Parvati Patil are said in the books to be “the most attractive girls in the year” (as attested to by Dean Thomas, at least).] But in the movies, Emma’s Hermione is such a looker she gives those other girls a run for their Galleons…
Anyway, getting back to Evanna as Luna, I was consequently skeptical of Rowling’s declaration that here was another girl who was perfect for her part. But after watching Evanna’s Luna I’d have to say that Jo Rowling wasn’t exaggerating one bit about her being perfectly cast! She’s got that dirty silver blonde hair, that odd but serene expression, and that dreamy voice to a tee! Her performance really stood out in the midst of all these distinguished, career actors. That Evanna Lynch is a certified Harry Potter fan (she’d been, er, crazy about the series since she was 8 and had even engaged in correspondence with Rowling) could have only added to the magic of the Potter phenomenon, and I imagine all Potterholics resonate with her. I look forward to Evanna being chosen as the narrator of a retrospective that will look back on Harry Potter decades from now.
–Mercury